Opinion is different from reviews primarily because it is based on your own experience. Opinion is always subjective, individual. Be as honest. However, try to be polite – even if the scenery appeared to you to be poor, and the acting is dull and insincere, report it correctly, not trying to offend. And superlative terms like "excellent", "amazing", the abundance of exclamation marks will also decorate the opinion, but rather will be forced to suspect you of exaggerating. Your opinion must be justified – allegations that the show is bad or good, just don't tell those for whom you write a review.
There are no clear building plan review, but it is possible to allocate some key moments. Comment on the game actors, directing moves that seemed unusual to you. No need to retell the plot of the play. Better note that you struck, found an echo in the soul, and that, on the contrary, did not cause any emotions. Tell me, how similar were your ideas about the characters embodied by the actors images.
Don't be afraid to seem ignorant – opinion does not require a thorough knowledge of the laws of the theater, careful analysis of the Director's work. Describe your mood: it was while watching how much has changed by the end of the play. You may want to compare the viewed performance with other performances of this piece, if you've seen them before.
Imagine that the other person will make the decision to watch it this show or not, based on your opinion. Let the one who reads it, will penetrate the atmosphere in the hall, the feelings of the audience, want to see what you, or decide not to waste our time.
Advice 2: How to write a review of the
Opinion about the work, usually this is a short feature on the scientific or technical development, which says its leader, or customer. Like any document, it has its own structure and should contain some mandatory sections. This list will include brief characteristics of the issue, which is dedicated to the development, and the dignity and distinction that this work has. The opinion must also be pointed out the existing deficiencies, assessed the practical significance and evaluation of this work.
Written feedback on standard A4 paper format and formatted in accordance with GOST R 6.30-2003 "Unified systems of the documentation. Unified system of organizational and administrative documentation. Requirements to paperwork".
Write a title containing the word "Review" and specify the item for which you give his assessment of the degree work, scientific work, scientific and technical development.
Describe the topic of the work, assess the relevance of its condition and need solutions. It is possible to result comparison with existing global and Russian counterparts, to indicate the differences.
Give a brief overview of the structure and on the contents of its sections.
Rate the dignity of work, quality of its performance. If there are any flaws, write about them, and separately list those that should be eliminated in a certain period of time.
Tell us about the practical significance of the work, how the results will affect economic performance, or to increase productivity. Tell me what will give this work in scientific terms or for production.
Give direct assessment work in terms of quality – "Excellent", "Good" or "Satisfactory".
Sign work with their full regalia and positions.