Advice 1: How to write a review for the project

A review of the project, consisting of two to three pages of text, requires a large amount of work. The reviewer should not only briefly review the contents of the project, but also to divide it into its component parts and evaluate each of them separately. As a rule, the evaluation of the projectand is composed of six items.
How to write a review for the project
Instruction
1
Please rate the relevance of the topic of the project. It should have value not only as a contribution to science, but the idea that you can bring to life in the modern world. Write a review how high practical relevance in the case of introduction of the developments in life.
2
Check the novelty of the work. It is important that the creators of the projectand brought something new in already investigated earlier sector or (especially valuable) has developed a completely not studied until this point. In the second case, note also the presence or absence of theoretical base and ability of the authors of the projectand to work with a limited number of resources.
3
Analyze the main provisions of the draft. Note the pros and cons of each, evaluate the adequacy of the methods used, the sufficiency of reasoning and the validity of the findings. Also calculate the percentage of theoretical and practical parts of the work, make a conclusion about the rationality of such distribution depending on the themes of the project.
4
Note the depth of the topic and the logical presentation of the material. Every conclusion reinforce the arguments and quotations from the work.
5
Check out how well designed a projectif it meets the rules established for this type of research. If there are errors, write what and how they are significant.
6
Rate the practical importance of the project. Tell us what exactly it will occur and under what conditions it would be more rational to use the provided work.
7
Arrange your review in accordance with the regulations. Typically, in such reviews in the first row of the worksheet specifies the name of the projectand the names and initials of the authors. Then using the indent is written the main text, divided according to meaning into paragraphs. At the bottom of the last page, the surname, initials and title of the reviewer, put his signature and date of the document. If necessary, the signature of the seal of the office of the organization which employs the author of the review.

Advice 2 : How to make a review

In the epic called "thesis" has a lot of moving parts in addition to the main and the main is about the writing of the diploma. Including protection does not take place, if not reviews of the final work. And review, in turn, cannot be considered complete if you do not issue it in accordance with the accepted standards.
How to make a review
Instruction
1
Rules of making documents associated with the diploma, spelled out in the University regulations about WRC (final qualifying work) and can be adjusted in each of the universities. So before you use our recommendations, take on the chair position.
2
Getting directly to the skin, turn on Caps Lock and set the text justification and single spacing. Headset Times New Roman, write the word "Review" (without the quotes), using 14 PT font. Go to the next line.
3
Disabling the caps, type with a lowercase letter "a thesis (or thesis project or master's thesis depending on the type of the reviewed work). This and the previous line will highlight in bold. Make a single indent down.
4
The following lines are not highlighted and in bold are typed when the text justification. With a capital letter write "Student (or students) and add the surname, name and patronymic of the author of the diploma in the genitive case. Press Enter and name the code and name of training, specialties (e.g., Specialty 050505 "Journalism"). On the next line write the name of the profile or specialization, if any.
5
After another indent should be the topic title of the thesis: "Topic: "so-and-So".
6
By double-clicking on the Enter key, you can dial the main text of the review. It should contain an assessment of the relevance of the topic, analysis of the main provisions, methods and depth of study, compliance with the rules of registration of WRC. The reviewer should conclude that the practical importance of the work and to assess on a four-point scale and a recommendation on the award of the student with specific skills.
7
The signature is sometimes required to assure the office of the University where he works.
8
After the main text write "Reviewer", put a comma and a new line enter the academic degree, rank, position of expert and place of work (completely) – this information should be placed on the left of the sheet, in a column. In the center of the sheet leaves room for signature and on the right are called the initials and surname. With a new line – the number of digits in quotes, month (word) and the year in full.

Advice 3 : How to write a review on scientific work

For the presentation of scientific work alone is not enough report. Need more reviews work. If you had the role of the reviewer, are supposed to read given the author's abstract or the entire work and to make written or verbal feedback, depending on the person, if you will have to act on the protection of the applicant. There are generally accepted standards for the compilation of reviews of scientific work.
How to write a review on scientific work
You will need
  • - copmuter;
  • - original article.
Instruction
1
Write a title for review. Specify the title and the name of its author.
2
In the early reviews mention about what is the topic work which the author conducted research.
3
Pay attention to the relevance of the research problem, novelty and practical significance. Usually the author of the study refers to this issue in the introduction to the work.
4
In the next section give a brief content of the work. Check whether all the required sections it contains, what are the main provisions. Specify the amount of visual material – charts, tables, diagrams, rate, sufficient to understand the research they presented.
5
Then describe the total impression of the work, whether the content of the tasks, what is the quality of presentation.
6
An important part of the reviews – the perks of the job. As the perfect work does not exist, you will definitely find that it is possible to mention. Comments can refer to the study itself, and the content of the work, the presence of errors in it. It is equally important not to dwell on this, and at the end to indicate that these comments do not reduce the level of work, and that the author should consider them as suggestions to further work.
7
Now proceed with the analysis of the work. Depending on its type, you either Express a desire for ratings (for diplomas and course works), or recommend to give the applicant the required degree (for theses). Again mention about the quality of work.
8
Don't forget at the end of the review to provide information about yourself – name, academic degree, position, place of work. Also please sign and date. On a review it will be necessary to affix appropriate seal and either give it to the applicant personally or send by mail.
Is the advice useful?
Search