Advice 1: How to sue the person for slander

Slander is called common initially false information aimed at discrediting a person. May be oral or written, individual or mass. The assurances of the lawyers to prove in court that you are faced with the slander, is problematic. However, to sue the offender for the crime is still possible.
How to sue the person for slander

The difficulty in proving that you are faced with the slander, is that such a crime simply to be confused with an insult. It's estimated the legislation is much simpler and carries no real penalties in the form of detention.

To bring the case to court under article 129 "Libel", you need to very carefully collect all of the evidence. Information that discredits the honor and dignity of the person and fall under article of the criminal code, should be documented. For example, these can be newspaper clippings, record of television programs, blogs and Internet Postings, copies of worksheets public speaking, etc. In case, if there is a problem with the search for such information, such as a blog or a message was deleted, you can contact the site to request help with recovering your data.

If slander was promulgated by one person to another without the presence of third parties, to prove his involvement in the Commission of a crime would be virtually impossible. It is therefore necessary to record all received from this man's data recorder or a hidden camera.

In order to sue the person for slander, you need to clearly distinguish discrediting the honor and dignity information and the usual insulting words. For example, the phrase "stupid student" slander will not be considered, even if the student is a winner of various awards and winner of numerous diplomas. If about the person say that he stole from the cash register of your accounting money, at a time when he was in the hospital and could not to go there - this could be regarded as slander.

However, to indict the accuser will not work in those cases if it has spread management, though, and undermining the reputation of another person, but at the same time, data untrue. Also, if a person reported information about the other, considering them to be reliable. And to punish the offender does not work in that case, if they distributed false information was not damaging the reputation of another.

Advice 2 : How to prove the correctness

Often there are situations when you have to prove their innocence or to convince her of his opponents. Skills and the ability to prove his innocence especially needed for those whose activities are connected with people: teachers, sales consultants, leaders, workers ' groups, and politicians. However, these skills are always useful for any person in his life.
How to prove the correctness
We're going to talk about the dispute in which it is not the truth, only the desire to prove that your opinion is the only right and fruitful discussion, when everyone wants to come to a common opinion.
Innocence you have to prove in that case, if questioning her. You should not go immediately into the bottle, and quietly and respectfully listen to the opinion of your opponent, not interrupting it. Ask clarifying questions and try to disprove it is wrong, in your opinion, statement. Until you come to a common opinion, your innocence cannot be proven.
Connect the logic and common sense, argue all my statements. Cannot be considered proof of your innocence such arguments as: "I think so", "As everyone knows", "Always been so".
If your innocence can be proven by documents, use that evidence. If it can be confirmed by the actual numerical values, bring them in. Do not be unfounded and your conclusions and assertions will agree is much faster.
Stick to during the discussion respectful and fair tone. If you used insights unknown to the interlocutor the facts, it is not necessary to emphasize his incompetence. Don't get personal and don't let the condescending, ironic, or aggressive tone.
Before entering into a discussion, think about whether your partner wants to be sure in your rightness and is ready to change his opinion. There are people who are always sure they are right and absolutely not ready to change their point of view. Any attempt to convince them that their opinion is wrong, is perceived as an attack on their credibility and their reaction can be very painful. Why do you have to buy enemies. If the dispute relates to beliefs and phenomena, then there is no point to prove anything, because each person can have their own point of view
Is the advice useful?