For students in middle and high school uses a 5-point rating system, which involves maximum five and minimum score – a zero. Describe the score: 5 – excellent, 4 – good, 3 – satisfactory, 2 – poor and 1 – very bad.
To assign grades to students, follow the rules given in the national programs for each specific school subject. To be objective, check just what was asked and be prepared to argue the mark. You have the right to reduce the single points of untidy overall look.
Do not make any marks for bad behavior in the log along with marks about the progress on the subject. Only do this in the journal to draw the attention of parents. However, if the child is too distracted in class and not listening to you, then this assessment may be adequate if it does not answer your question.
Plan the lesson so that to interview at least five people. Minimum number of grades in school – one mark for each month for each student. Given the size of the class, to achieve this objective, the lesson is pretty active, but try not to understate the estimates for the slow response, give the child some time to answer the question.
Assess all students when conducting the written tests. Essays and of presentation rate double mark for grammar and content. Check before the next lesson according to the accepted norms ZUN (knowledge, skills).
Assign additional time absent in the control classes because of illness or because of absenteeism a student, and also received a "unsatisfactory". If necessary, guide optional lesson for those who do not have time on your subject.
Print the intermediate (quarter, semester) and a final (for the year) evaluation based on the average score of all marks received by the student during the specified period. If it is too low or there are "debts" on a test or home work, assign additional time for a retake.
Put for oral answers:"5", if the student solved the entire contents of the specified material, skillfully used the obtained knowledge in independent work, accurately applied, adopted symbols or terminology, demonstrated the sustainability of the acquired skills. Forgivable for one or two small inaccuracies in the reservation or negligence."4" - mistakes were made in the coverage of additional questions, often probing questions of the teacher, there is a small gaps, not distorting the overall response."3" - content of the material is not fully disclosed, but the student has demonstrated General understanding of the topic, no resistance skills, the inability to immediately apply knowledge in a new task, inaccurate terminology or symbolism of the object, the inability to answer without leading questions."2" - the content of the material not disclosed, the student does not know the most part of the specified scope of the topic, numerous errors in the solution, the use of terminology that are impossible to fix, even after leading questions.
Evaluate written work to:"5" - maximum 1 structurally unstable error, the overall accuracy of the work performed, good spelling."4" up to 2 errors and 2 inaccuracies plus good design and competence of the student."3" to 4 of the 5 errors and inaccuracies, neat design."2" more than 4 major errors.