Advice 1: Why do people answer a question with a question

To answer the question the question is a well – known argumentative ploy that has long been used in the conduct of the debate for a particular purpose. Some opponents use this technique intuitive, but often resort to it deliberately. Why is it necessary?
Why do people answer a question with a question
To answer the question , the question can be, and in some cases even necessary. There is a perception that the use of this technique is inappropriate. After all, educated people should only give direct answers to questions. But it is a problem of parenting, not polemics. And smart speakers that is the correct line – don't answer the question to the question - used to deftly seize the initiative in the conversation. It is known that he who asks more questions controls the dialogue and dominates the conversation. This technique is "question the question" can be quite useful for intercepting initiatives on important and fateful negotiations, and especially if you realize that the conversation you are trying to manipulate and impose their views. The best defense is a good offense. And here we can apply another effective technique is "attack issues". The answer is always more complex and more responsible than to ask, because in a dispute the more important to ask questions, to provoke the people's reasoning. The goal is again to seize the initiative and to put your opponent in a difficult position.This technique is pretty convenient and in a different situation. Answering a question on a question, you can tactfully, gently and wittily to avoid the necessity of reply, to take the source completely the other way and even to puzzle him. So, not wanting to reveal their unwillingness to give an account, the debater on a question, poses a counter question mark. An example from N. In. Gogol's "Dead souls": "And how much is bought the soul of Elijah? – whispered Sobakevich. – A Sparrow why attributed? told him in response to this Chichikov". This technique is beloved and the great debaters - truth seekers, and professional journalists. If you do not feed bread - give to bet, then "question the question" is your reception. The source quickly revealed and can even give inconvenient answers.If you don't want to be answered so evasively, configure your questions directly, clearly and specifically. In a serious conversation it will eliminate possible ambiguity.

Advice 2 : How to evade a direct answer

Some have been taught that all of the questions to be answered. And preferably the complete answer. People grew up, grew together with them, understanding that there are questions to which the answer is just not desirable. These include tricky, silly and direct questions. How competently to leave from the answer?
How to evade a direct answer
Often the questions posed in the forehead, caught off guard and delivering mental discomfort. It's one thing if you communicate with a good friend, relative or mate. Another thing, when asks such questions from a stranger. Here much depends on education: to respond with rudeness, disregard, or cheat. When you don't know what to say, you need to avoid answering.
You can ask another similar question or issue from a completely different region. Even if you count bad-mannered - peace of mind more expensive. Celebrities and politicians it's what you do with the Intrusive questions of reporters.
If the question is not quite correctly placed, you can leave it unanswered. Pretend you did not hear or did not understand what was going on. Parry the question with a joke, humor is always appropriate.
If nature gave you the gift of eloquence, pour water. The more words, to anything you are not binding the better. Answer a direct question in order to confuse the interlocutor. "Userchoice" question, mentally put a person on the spot.
One question to ask a lot of clarifying questions. Do it with sincere expression, to convince the person of interest. This will discourage the opponent.
Find out why the interviewee asks this question. What purpose it serves? Goals are noble and low. So you are fully turned his attention to his opponent.
If you do not want to answer a direct question or don't know the answer, flatter interlocutor, praising him for his quick wit and mind. Meanwhile discreetly move the conversation in another direction.
Offer to discuss the formulation of this question, having reformulated it and smoothly moving the conversation from the interrogation debate.
Ignore an inconvenient question or answer: "I don't know, I thought about it." Blatantly stated the person that you are not interested and Instead talk about you."
Roughly tear off the interlocutor, giving him to understand that he crosses permissible boundaries of decency. In extreme cases, you can improve the tone and go for the conflict - the end justifies the means.
Is the advice useful?