Any hearing in a civil or criminal case is accompanied by a management Protocol, which includes all the procedural steps, the explanations of the participants and other necessary information. But in full protocols are made within three days after the end of the meeting. Interested persons may submit to the judge the petition for familiarization with the Protocol. In civil proceedings, such a request can be submitted at any time, but the deadline for comments on the report is limited to five days from the moment of its signing. In criminal process the petition for familiarization with the Protocol should be submitted within three days from the date of completion of the hearing, although if you pass this deadline for valid reasons, the persons concerned can ask for its restoration.
If a party to a civil process, or participant of the criminal process detects errors or inaccuracies in the Protocol after examination thereof, they may submit comments on this document. The judge will consider these comments alone, if necessary, making the Protocol changes and clarifications. If comments are without parties is impossible (for example, required some explanation), the participants in the process can also be called to resolve the issue of amendments to the Protocol. The deadline for comments on the report is counted from the moment of acquaintance with him, for good reasons and petition of the interested party, this period can also be restored.
If a participant of proceedings on administrative offence expressed intention to read the transcript of the hearing, it should consider that the administrative code does not require logging in this kind of process. The only exception is the case of the collegial administrative body or the court. If the Protocol is still underway, the interested party may file a petition for acquaintance with him, however, the filing of comments on the record in this case is not provided. All objections, clarifications and comments can be expressed by the participant of the proceedings in the complaint to final resolution in the administrative case.
What to do when the Protocol of inaccuracies?
If a party to a civil process, or participant of the criminal process detects errors or inaccuracies in the Protocol after examination thereof, they may submit comments on this document. The judge will consider these comments alone, if necessary, making the Protocol changes and clarifications. If comments are without parties is impossible (for example, required some explanation), the participants in the process can also be called to resolve the issue of amendments to the Protocol. The deadline for comments on the report is counted from the moment of acquaintance with him, for good reasons and petition of the interested party, this period can also be restored.
How to read the Protocol on the administrative case?
If a participant of proceedings on administrative offence expressed intention to read the transcript of the hearing, it should consider that the administrative code does not require logging in this kind of process. The only exception is the case of the collegial administrative body or the court. If the Protocol is still underway, the interested party may file a petition for acquaintance with him, however, the filing of comments on the record in this case is not provided. All objections, clarifications and comments can be expressed by the participant of the proceedings in the complaint to final resolution in the administrative case.
